Ghostzapper finally off the mark

5 thoughts on “Ghostzapper finally off the mark”

  1. Granted, Ghostzapper did have some soundness issues during his career, but I’m not sure that his meager number of starts were really caused by lack of soundness, rather than Bobby Frankel’s quite transparent desire to get this horse into stud duty.

    An outstanding businessman and not as outstanding a sportsman, Frankel’s campaigning of Ghostzapper (and especially his public comments about it) were infuriating, to put it mildly. Just because I recently reviewed the topic: do you remember that after ‘Zapper’s 2005 Met Mile romp, which turned out to be his last race, Frankel stated the champ wouldn’t start in the Suburban because the horse needed to “freshen up”? Understandably, considering the horse had just completed a grueling 1-race campaign after being laid-off since the previous year’s BC. Shortly afterwards, this wonderful horse was retired.

    I am in no position to make such judgements myself, but I remember that at the time, a racing forum acquaintance who does have the professional expertise told me that for all he could gather, Ghostzapper’s retirement was the equivalent of retiring a basketball player due to a cracked thumb.

  2. I’m certainly not an expert, but is it possible that Ghostzapper is being bred to horses that he doesn’t “fit” with? Is it possible for a dirt miler like Ghostzapper to have a better “fit” with turf stayers or cheaper broodmares than the ones he usually gets? Does that ever happen?

    -Jameel

  3. Malcer:

    Thanks for the comments. For stud purposes, it certainly would not have helped the horse’s cause if “soundness” issues were associated with him; therefore, Bobby would never have intimated that there was something wrong with the horse.The bare facts, however, tell a story: 11 starts over 4 seasons, or almost 3 starts per year, on average. Usually the most talented horses are the ones with “issues” because they run so hard, and conversely, it’s said that the “sound” horses are usually the slowest because they never exert themselves hard enough to get aches and pains. Whatever was “officially” said in Ghostzapper’s case doesn’t quite jive with the facts, especially as he was such a fast, brillliant horse, who gave 110%.
    I’m sure if it had been possible, they’d have raced him more, because he was so superior to his peers.

  4. Jameel,

    It’s possible. Secretariat initially didn’t get the mares that best suited him and consequently started off slow. Sharpen Up was a stallion who preferred the cheaper typesof mares he got earlier in his career to the “richer”pedigreed and raced mares that he covered in Kentucky.

    It also may be that the Ghostzappers are harder to keep sound, and all weather and turf might be the best surfaces for them. All interesting possibilities that we’ll have to monitor.

    Nothing is ever in black and white in the breeding business; instead, it’s shades of grays, and your questions were quite in this vein.

Comments are closed.